A wind project is stalled in New York. Experts worry about impacts across the U.S.  紐約的一個(gè)風(fēng)力發(fā)電項(xiàng)目陷入停滯，專家擔(dān)憂此舉將影響全美。  U.S. Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum has ordered a halt to an offshore wind project near the coast of Long Island. Today, Equinor, the Norwegian energy company that owns and operates the project, announced it is complying with the order and suspending all construction.  美國內(nèi)政部部長道格·伯格姆已下令暫停長島海岸附近的一個(gè)海上風(fēng)電項(xiàng)目。今日，該項(xiàng)目所有者兼運(yùn)營商——挪威能源公司Equinor宣布，將遵照命令暫停所有建設(shè)工作。  

　　President Trump, a longtime critic of wind energy, issued a moratorium on new development of offshore wind projects, one of his first executive orders upon returning to the White House.  特朗普總統(tǒng)長期以來一直批評(píng)風(fēng)能，他在重返白宮后發(fā)布的首批行政命令之一，就是暫停新的海上風(fēng)電項(xiàng)目開發(fā)。  

　　But Burgum's decision escalates the Administration's opposition to offshore wind because the multi-billion dollar project in New York already had its federal permits and had broken ground, says Robert Freudenberg, ?a vice president at the Regional Plan Association, an energy nonprofit in the New York metropolitan area.  但能源非營利組織區(qū)域規(guī)劃協(xié)會(huì)（位于紐約大都會(huì)區(qū)）的副主席羅伯特·弗勞登伯格表示，伯格姆的決定加劇了政府對(duì)海上風(fēng)電的反對(duì)態(tài)度，因?yàn)榧~約的這一數(shù)十億美元項(xiàng)目已獲得聯(lián)邦許可并已破土動(dòng)工。  "This really is next level offshore wind aggression," Freudenberg says.  “這真的是海上風(fēng)電領(lǐng)域前所未有的激進(jìn)行為，”弗勞登伯格說。  

　　The offshore wind project, called Empire Wind 1, was supposed to supply power to 500,000 homes in New York. The federal lease for the project was signed during the first Trump administration in 2017. Much of the federal permitting for this project happened during the Biden administration.  這個(gè)名為“帝國風(fēng)電1號(hào)”的海上風(fēng)電項(xiàng)目，本應(yīng)為紐約的50萬戶家庭供電。該項(xiàng)目的聯(lián)邦租賃協(xié)議于2017年特朗普第一任期內(nèi)簽署。該項(xiàng)目的大部分聯(lián)邦許可工作是在拜登政府期間完成的。  

　　In a letter to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), the lead federal agency for permitting offshore wind projects, Burgum wrote that "approval for the project was rushed through by the prior administration without sufficient analysis."  伯格姆在致海上風(fēng)電項(xiàng)目許可主管機(jī)構(gòu)——海洋能源管理局（BOEM）的一封信中寫道：“該項(xiàng)目未經(jīng)充分分析便被前政府倉促批準(zhǔn)?！?nbsp; 

　　The letter did not give details about the alleged rush. The Interior Department did not respond to NPR's request for comment. The idea that the review of this wind project was rushed is not supported by evidence, says Matthew Eisenson, senior fellow at Columbia University's Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.  這封信并未詳細(xì)說明所謂的“倉促”之處。內(nèi)政部未對(duì)NPR的置評(píng)請(qǐng)求作出回應(yīng)。哥倫比亞大學(xué)薩賓氣候變化法律中心的高級(jí)研究員馬修·艾森森表示，認(rèn)為該項(xiàng)目審查過于倉促的說法并無依據(jù)。  

　　?"BOEM spent two and a half years conducting an environmental review. The final product of that environmental review is an environmental impact statement that's over 3000 pages long, with all of its appendices, and it's very thorough," Eisenson says. "?This rationale, it's very suspect."  “海洋能源管理局花了兩年半時(shí)間進(jìn)行環(huán)境審查。最終的環(huán)境審查報(bào)告是一份超過3000頁的環(huán)境影響聲明，包括所有附錄，內(nèi)容非常詳盡，”艾森森說，“這一理由很值得懷疑?！?nbsp;